MULTI-OBJECTIVE DAYLIGHT OPTIMISATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING IN CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-3034-2024-36-4

Keywords:

sustainable architecture, public buildings, office buildings, energy-efficiency, passive design strategies, daylighting, daylight factor, daylight glare probability, window-to-wall ratio, solar shading devices, light shelves

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is: to analyze the possibilities of multi-objective daylight optimization of an office premise in climatic conditions of Ukraine; to propose academically proven method for daylight optimization in order to achieve optimal values of Daylight factor (DF) and Daylight glare probability (DGP); to reveal optimal values of windowto- wall ratio (WWR), window length-to-width ratio and shading device depth of south façade for two locations – Kyiv & Odesa. Methods. Literature review of scientific papers and regulations, as well as computer simulations using computer-aided design software – Rhinoceros, visual programming language – Grasshopper, plugins – Ladybug Tools & Honeybee, and Octopus. Results. The multi-objective daylight optimization method of the office space in the climatic conditions of Ukraine was tested; optimal façade design options of office buildings from the point of view of DF and DGP were identified; optimal values of WWR, windows proportions and shading devices depth were discovered; office buildings façade design comparison for two climatic zones of Ukraine was conducted (for Kyiv and Odesa). Conclusions. Architects are suggested to use multi-objective daylight optimization at early design stage for façade design. Architectural design on the basis of environmental computer simulations provides rather accurate results for design solutions including: values of WWR, window proportions, shading devices depth, etc. The compromise between environmental design and aesthetical approach can lead to sustainable, environmentally conscious architectural solutions.

References

Nguyen A., Reiter S., Rigo P. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy. 2013. № 113. P. 1043–1058.

Eltaweel A., Su Y. Parametric design and daylighting: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017. № 73. P. 1086–1103.

Multi-objective optimization of daylight illuminance indicators and energy usage intensity for office space in Tehran by genetic algorithm / Hakimazari M., et al. Energy Reports. 2024. № 11. P. 3283–3306.

Ziaee N., Vakilinezhad R. Multi-objective optimization of daylight performance and thermal comfort in classrooms with light-shelves: Case studies in Tehran and Sari, Iran. Energy & Buildings. 2022. № 254.

Multi-phase framework for optimization of thermal and daylight performance of residential buildings based on the combination of ventilation and window design / Wang J., et al. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2020. № 20. P. 785–805.

Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution / Beck H. E., et al. Scientific Data. 2018. № 5.

ДБН В.2.6-31:2021 «Теплова ізоляція та енергоефективність будівель». Київ : Мінрегіон України, 2022.

ДБН В.2.5-28:2018 «Природне і штучне освітлення». Київ : Мінрегіон України, 2018.

Wienold J., Christoffersen J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy & Buildings. 2006. №. 38. P. 743–757.

Deb K. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley & Sons, 2011. 497 p.

Han Y., et al. Simulation-based multi-objective optimization of timber-glass residential buildings in severe cold regions. Sustainability. 2017. №. 9.

Meteonorm Version 8. Meteonorm. URL: https://meteonorm.com/en/meteonorm-version-8 (дата звернення: 29.11.24).

SunEarthTools.com: [сайт]. URL: https://www.sunearthtools.com/ (дата звернення: 29.11.24).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30