VISUAL AND IMAGINATIVE PRINCIPLES OF FORM-MAKING IN ARCHITECTURE: THE SYNTHESIS OF DRAWING, PAINTING, AND DIGITAL VISUALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-3034-2026-39-8Keywords:
architectural form-making, visual image, drawing, painting, digital visualization, architectural graphics, design thinkingAbstract
The article examines the visual and imaginative principles of form-making in architecture through the synthesis of academic drawing, painting, and digital visualization. The aim of the study is to identify the role of traditional artistic disciplines and digital tools in the formation of an architectural image, as well as to analyze the patterns of their interaction in contemporary design practice and professional training of architects and designers. Particular attention is paid to defining the principles of sequential and iterative form-making based on the interaction of analog and digital visualization tools. Research methods. The study employs a complex of methods, including formal-compositional and artistic-analytical analysis of architectural images, comparative analysis of analog and digital visualization tools, visual observation, and structural-semantic analysis. The research is based on the examination of educational and professional architectural projects that demonstrate a gradual and cyclical transition from hand drawing and painterly interpretation of form to digital models and visualizations. Results. The research reveals that drawing and painting remain fundamental instruments of architectural thinking, enabling deep spatial and imaginative comprehension of a design concept. Digital visualization significantly expands the possibilities of architectural representation, enhancing its communicative and presentational capacity; however, it also requires critical consideration due to the risks of standardization and the dominance of visual effect over conceptual thinking. The article proposes a model of interaction between drawing, painting, and digital visualization as complementary stages of a unified creative and design process. The synthesis of analog and digital means contributes to the creation of an integral visual and imaginative structure of an architectural object, combining artistic intuition, constructive logic, and technological precision. Conclusions. The visual and imaginative principles of architectural form-making are grounded in the interaction of drawing, painting, and digital visualization as complementary components of a unified creative process. The proposed approach makes it possible to interpret architectural form-making as a dynamic and iterative system in which analog and digital tools are not opposed to each other but function in interrelation. Such a synthesis ensures the multidimensionality of the architectural image, improves the quality of design solutions, and fosters the development of professional thinking in future architects and designers. The findings are relevant for the advancement of architectural education and for understanding contemporary trends in architectural visual culture.
References
Брильов С. В., Палієнко О. О., Хівренко К. В. Образотворче мистецтво як інструмент формування креативного мислення в архітектурі та дизайні. Scientific Researches and Methods of Their Carrying Out: World Experience and Domestic Realities: матеріали IX Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції (Vinnytsia, UKR – Vienna, AUT, online, 18 квітня 2025 р.). Київ, 2025. С. 994–996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.18.04.2025.136
Брильов С. В., Кузьмічова В. С., Колесников В. В. Образотворче мистецтво та дизайн в епоху діджиталізації: тренди, виклики. АРТ-платФОРМА. 2024. Т. 10, № 2. С. 228–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51209/platform.2.10.2024.228-241
Академічна школа в сучасних умовах: стратегії розвитку образотворчого мистецтва та дизайну в мистецьких закладах вищої освіти України / Брильов С. В. та ін. Збірник наукових праць «Українська академія мистецтва». 2024. Вип. 35. С. 104–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-3034-2024-35-11
Брильов С. В., Козік В. В., Хівренко К. В. Формування професійного мислення архітектора і дизайнера через призму образотворчого мистецтва: живопис, рисунок, скульптура. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, м. Умань, 28 березня 2025 р. Умань, 2025. С. 275–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-28.03.2025.009
Al-Rqaibat S., Al Nusair S., Bataynah R. Enhancing architectural education through hybrid digital tools: Investigating the impact on design creativity and cognitive processes. Smart Learning Environments. 2025. Vol. 12, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00370-9
Bergera I., de Esteban J. Architecture and contemporary visual culture: The image of realism and the realism of image. Arts. 2022. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11010026
Heidari P., Polatoğlu Ç. Current discussions on digital sketching in the early stages of architectural design in education. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning. 2018. Vol. 28, No. 1. P. 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.28.1.25
Pilley S., Gamble S. Walking and sketching as a tool for architectural design. UF Journal of Undergraduate Research. 2023. Vol. 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.25.133475
Tai N. C. Analytical sketching in architectural practice: An integrated approach to document and observe the built environment. Journal of Architectural Education and Practice. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2097241
Park J., Jin Y., Ahn S., Lee S. The impact of design representation on visual perception: Comparing eye-tracking data of architectural scenes between photography and line drawing. Archives of Design Research. 2019. Vol. 32, No. 1. P. 5–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5
Čahtarević R. Extended reality of architecture: Beyond photo-reality of architectural representation and visualization. Acta Architectonica et Urbanistica. 2025. Vol. 1, No. 2. P. 94–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65262/fkazv920
An augmented and interactive exhibition of an archived model for Frederick Kiesler’s Endless House / Niblock C. et al. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2022. Vol. 11, No. 6. P. 993–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.04.002
Xu C., Huang Y. Technological innovation in architectural design education: Empirical analysis and future directions of Midjourney intelligent drawing software. Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 10. P. 3288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103288
Sipahioglu N., Gürer E. Computing colour and narrative in architectural sketches: A model framework to support sketching in computational design. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2025), Токіо, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2025.1.019
Yıldızoğlu N. Sketching versus digital design tools in architectural design. Journal of Computational Design. 2024. Vol. 5, No. 2. P. 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1504947
Septika D. A. K. Image-making and architecture: A digital medium for qualitative design representative. Built Environment Studies. 2020. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 29–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/best.v1i1.504
Брильов С. В., Козік В. В., Хівренко К. В. Роль живопису, рисунка і скульптури у формуванні мислення архітектора та дизайнера. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук. 2025. № 1(85). С. 87–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/85-1-13

